Published in collaboration with NCMS
Digital Manufacturing Report

News & information about the fast-moving world
of digital manufacturing, modeling & simulation

Language Flags

The Visible IT Organization: Status and Metrics Reporting


A manufacturing company, whether small or large, is only as good as its IT department.  And one of the hallmarks of a good IT department is how well it is aligned with corporate objectives. 

Paul Ingevaldson has been involved in computing since 1965, ending his corporate career in 2004 after 25 years of service at Ace Hardware that culminated with his running the IT department and Ace’s international business.  It was a very good IT department, and, after retirement, Paul has been teaching, writing, and lecturing on the many lessons he has learned over the years. He is contributing editor to the Digital Manufacturing Report.

The 9 ½ Secrets of a Great IT Organization, published this year, is one of the results.  The book is available on Amazon.com, Barnes & Noble, and via Kindle or Nook.

We presented a chapter from the book last August. Here’s another – this time on the all-important topic of metrics and IT visibility. 

As Kathleen Melymuka, Paul’s former features editor at Computerworld, comments on the book jacket, "Reading Paul Ingevaldson is like listening to an old friend who just happens to be an exceptional CIO and a great teacher.  Pay attention!"


Many users feel that the IT department is a black hole that things go into but never come out of. Substantiating that perception are the many IT departments that like it that way and believe that the less scrutiny, the better. That is very dangerous for the modern IT organization. If IT wants to be a great enigma, then it should be willing to accept the consequences that follow. This mentality justifies receiving a lack of respect, mistrust of intent, and difficulty in entering into the mainstream of the company. Instead, IT must try to open itself up, show itself off and be accountable for its actions. IT must be equally willing to accept praise when it is successful and accept blame when it is at fault. In short, it must start acting like other departments in the company.

The best way to eliminate this veil of secrecy that has fallen over most IT activities is to develop a reporting methodology that communicates the status of projects to everyone in the corporation. This is Secret #9.  In my company, we published a report every month listing the projects that were approved, those that were completed, those in process, and those yet to be started. In addition, we included the original cost estimate for each project, an estimated completion date (if in process), and any changes that caused these initial estimates to be adjusted. We then justified any variations from the original estimates by indicating errors by IT in the initial estimate, new requests by the users (sometimes called scope creep), or new findings during development that changed the estimate.

We then published this report on the corporate Intranet for everyone to see. We highlighted every major change in yellow so no one could miss it. Any major changes would be discussed in detail at the next officers’ meeting. This way there were no surprises on major projects, and the officer group could discuss any ramifications that may occur due to the delay of any major implementations. As a result, discussions of IT progress became a routine part of everyday business. In addition, users across the company became very familiar with the major projects and their status. No one could ever say that they were blindsided by delays in project completion.

We did something else that enabled us to be more successful in meeting deadlines and budgets. We began to pay IT practitioners an incentive if they were successful in completing projects on time and within budget. It was amazing how this small step got projects done on time, eliminated a lot of scope creep requests from the users, required fewer changes in each monthly report, and began to give IT a better reputation on getting the job done.

This report was also the basis for each IT Steering Committee meeting that we held throughout the year to discuss status of projects. Based on issues, we would hold such a meeting quarterly or more often as needs required. At these interim meetings, we would discuss project progress, any significant cost issues raised by the new projects, and any other IT issues that rose to the level of the officers' concerns.

At some meetings, we were required to modify the project prioritization due to a change in the business, government requirements, legal issues, or changes in in-process projects that had the potential of significantly changing the ROI. This could be caused by changes by an outside vendor, requirement changes by the user that would significantly change the deliverables of the project, technical problems found during development, or any of a myriad of other issues that affected the completion and/or the cost of the project.

This process also kept the officer group engaged in the IT agenda and partly responsible for its actions. Since users ultimately own the IT projects, this is the proper way to do it in the modern corporation.

Metrics are an important step in the maturation of any IT department. Numbers are the language of business, and knowledgeable executives always know the key numbers that are critical for the company. However, there are many IT executives who speak in generalities about their department, and really haven’t tried to document the critical numbers that should point out to others the successes of the IT department.

IT leaders should:

  • Know the average response time for critical online systems.
  • Know the mean time to resolve any online problems for users.
  • Track disk utilization and processor utilization on the mainframe/servers in order to anticipate upgrades.
  • Be aware of the cost of IT as a percentage of revenue, and they should be able to talk to their CEOs about the return on investment that IT has achieved over the past year.
  • Be aware of how much enhancement/maintenance work the department does relative to new development, and also be aware of the size of their actual and potential development backlog.

Suffice it to say, a CIO who can quantify his/her operation in business measurement terms has a much better chance of being accepted by the company establishment that thrives on this kind of information. It will make IT look much more like an actual department rather than a group that relates more to its technology than to the corporation.

 

 

 

 

 

 

RSS Feeds

Subscribe to All Content


Feature Articles

Titan Puts a New Spin on GE’s Wind Turbine Research

Unlike traditional energy sources, wind is a trouble to tame, which has led GE to turn to advanced simulations at Oak Ridge National Laboratory to put the technology on track to cover 12 percent of the world's energy production.
Read more...

Lighting a Fire Under Combustion Simulation

Combustion simulation might seem like the ultimate in esoteric technologies, but auto companies, aircraft firms and fuel designers need increasingly sophisticated software to serve the needs of 21st century engine designs. HPCwire recently got the opportunity to take a look at Reaction Design, one of the premier makers of combustion simulation software, and talk with its CEO, Bernie Rosenthal.
Read more...

D-Wave Sells First Quantum Computer

On Wednesday, D-Wave Systems made history by announcing the sale of the world's first commercial quantum computer. The buyer was Lockheed Martin Corporation, who will use the machine to help solve some of their "most challenging computation problems." D-Wave co-founder and CTO Geordie Rose talks about the new system and the underlying technology.
Read more...

Short Takes

Local Motors and ORNL Partner for Automotive Manufacturing

Jan 24, 2014 | Local Motors, a vehicle innovator, and the U.S. Department of Energy’s Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) have announced a new partnership that they hope will bring change to the automotive industry.
Read more...

Robots Showcase Skills at DRC

Jan 22, 2014 | A month ago, the DARPA Robotics Challenge Trials (DRC) commenced. The main goal of the event was to aid in the development of robots that will someday respond to natural or even man-made disasters. At this year’s DRC, prototype robots from 16 teams were put through a series of trials in which they were to showcase their skills.
Read more...

Advanced Modeling Benefits Wind Farms

May 25, 2011 | Advanced computing resources optimize the site selection of wind farms.
Read more...

Not Your Parents' CFD

Oct 13, 2010 | Outdated beliefs stand in the way of greater CFD adoption.
Read more...

Manufacturers Turn to HPC to Cut Testing Costs

Oct 06, 2010 | Supercomputing saves money by reducing the need for physical testing.
Read more...

Sponsored Whitepapers

Technical Computing for a New Era

07/30/2013 | IBM | This white paper examines various means of adapting technical computing tools to accelerate product and services innovation across a range of commercial industries such as manufacturing, financial services, energy, healthcare, entertainment and retail. No longer is technically advanced computing limited to the confines of big government labs and academic centers. Today it is available to a wide range of organizations seeking a competitive edge.

The UberCloud HPC Experiment: Compendium of Case Studies

06/25/2013 | Intel | The UberCloud HPC Experiment has achieved the volunteer participation of 500 organizations and individuals from 48 countries with the aim of exploring the end-to-end process employed by digital manufacturing engineers to access and use remote computing resources in HPC centers and in the cloud. This Compendium of 25 case studies is an invaluable resource for engineers, managers and executives who believe in the strategic importance of applying advanced technologies to help drive their organization’s productivity to perceptible new levels.

Conferences and Events

Featured Events



Copyright © 2011-2014 Tabor Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Digital Manufacturing Report is a registered trademark of Tabor Communications, Inc. Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Tabor Communications Inc. is prohibited.
Powered by Xtenit.