Published in collaboration with NCMS
Digital Manufacturing Report

News & information about the fast-moving world
of digital manufacturing, modeling & simulation

Language Flags

Are You Ready for a New Manufacturing System?


How do you know when it’s time to upgrade or replace your manufacturing system?  That is, if you have one. 

Perhaps you fit into one of these categories:

  • You are managing your manufacturing operations using manual methods and it is becoming increasingly obvious that it’s time to automate
  • You are using entry-level software and want to move to a new level
  • Your manufacturing systems are old and showing their age; you’re ready for new technology

 If any of these scenarios resonate with your current situation, it’s time for a change. And you can use some help. 

Below we’ve included parts of an informative booklet from Sage North America, a supplier of business software and services.  “How to Chose a Manufacturing System” provides a lot of vendor-neutral information, ranging from whether or not you should buy manufacturing software to questions to ask your potential software supplier and consultants.

Below we’ve reprinted the last section of the booklet first: “Six Reasons Why New Manufacturing Systems Fail.”  Then we move to the beginning chapters and present a simple test that can help you determine just how ready you are to take the plunge.

Six Reasons Why New Manufacturing Systems Fail

1. A faulty inventory item numbering scheme

Consider a company that has two sources for chips. Even though each supplier has its own part number for the item, the company didn’t map out its own part numbering scheme properly. As a result, the item appears to be out of stock even though there are still chips on hand from the other supplier. There’s a right and a wrong way to set up inventory control when you have more than one supplier. If the program you’re using doesn’t have multiple supplier capabilities, you won’t be able to properly set up Inventory Control to reflect this. Make sure the system you are considering maintains a cross-reference between your internal part number and each supplier’s part number.

2. Insufficient control of content for bills of material

Every BOM needs to be entered correctly from the start, based on specifications received from engineering. Even if the BOM has all of the right components in theory, sometimes in practice quantities aren’t exactly what they need to be and then people on the shop floor start to personalize as they assemble. It’s critical that engineering and manufacturing communicate effectively over the correct structure of BOMs and that only qualified people are keeping BOMs up-to-date. Regardless of the size of your manufacturing operation, a robust security system will restrict unqualified people from using certain critical functions of the software.

 3. Inaccurate inventory on hand

One of the benefits of an integrated solution is that you eliminate redundancies in your system. One of the drawbacks is that errors can be compounded. If your inventory on hand is miscounted from the start, the error will repeat itself throughout your system. And the last thing you want is to be forced to close down for several days to do a physical inventory in order to identify discrepancies and reset your on-hand quantities. Manufacturing systems that offer “net-change” physical inventory functions will make it easy to correct stock counts without having to halt production activities.

4. Lack of agreement between engineering and manufacturing

Before implementing any system, it is absolutely essential that you reach an agreement between engineering and manufacturing on your goals and how you’re going to get there. It doesn’t matter how sophisticated your software is if you don’t have appropriate buy-in from these two departments. Work with your consultant to develop a thorough implementation plan. Make sure everyone in engineering, manufacturing, and management signs off on the plan before you begin installing software.

 5. Unrealistic expectations of what the system will be able to accomplish

Know exactly what you want to accomplish with your new system. You wouldn’t buy a Chevrolet to travel 200 m.p.h., nor would it make sense to pay a lot of money for a Lamborghini just to keep it in the driveway. Buying functionality you won’t ever need is just a waste of money. Make a careful list of the functionality you really need, adding a few of those “would be nice” items. Award major points to manufacturing systems that have a built-in growth path, especially if you can test-drive advanced functions using your own familiar data.

 6. Failure to determine the company’s needs in accounting, manufacturing,engineering and data collection

It is vital that you spend time thoroughly evaluating your company’s needs before choosing and installing any system. Get a complete review of the requirements in accounting, manufacturing, engineering and data collection. This is a mandatory step in the process – and one that cannot be skipped. Doing your homework in the planning stages will pay off ten-fold when it’s time to connect all the pieces. Ask your reseller if consultation and training is available directly from the software supplier.

 Now that you’re forewarned, it’s time to move on to the test to see if you actually need a system and, if so, what you can expect.

 Should Your Company Buy Manufacturing Software?

This simple test will tell you just how ready your company is to adopt a new manufacturing system.

1. Does your company currently use bills of material or recipes?

oYes. Go to question 2.

oNo. Stop. Most manufacturing companies rely on bills of material (BOMs) or recipes to track their material requirements. If you answered “no” to this question, you probably aren’t in the market for manufacturing software; instead, a job shop package may be what you need. Check with your local consultant for more information on available job shop solutions.

2. Does your company currently have some kind of manufacturing software in place?

oYes. Go to question 3.

oNo. Stop. You face a serious competitive threat from other companies that are reaping the benefits of manufacturing systems. Read the rest of this guide and get started on an implementation plan today.

3. Has your company experienced huge growth or significantly altered its lines of business in the last three years?

oYes. Stop. Growth or other significant business changes mean that you’re outgrowing your current systems. If your growth path is projected to continue, you need to consider new systems right away to ensure that your current system does not become obsolete.

oNo. Go to question 4.

 

4. Does your manufacturing software integrate seamlessly with your accounting software?

oYes. Go to question 5.

oNo. Go to question 7.

 5. Is your manufacturing software more than three years old?

oYes. Go to question 6.

oNo. Stop. If your integrated system was chosen carefully within the last three years, it should be working just fine. Before proceeding with a new purchase decision, discuss your situation with the consultant who helped you implement your current system.

6. Is there a satisfactory upgrade available from your current software supplier?

oYes. Stop. Contact your software vendor to find out more about upgrading your system right away.

oNo. Stop. You need to find a new supplier with a more serious commitment to ongoing product development. Now is a god time to take a look at the products available in today’s market.

 7. Is your accounting software more than three years old?

oYes. Go to question 8.

oNo. Stop. Without complete integration of your manufacturing and financial systems, you won’t get the full benefits of computerization. Blame and frustration will rule the day. Be sure to consider only those packages that can demonstrate full integration.

 8. Is your manufacturing software an in-house package invented or developed by your internal programming/IT staff?

oYes. Stop. Your system was probably developed years ago, before there were so many excellent software packages to chose from. Upgrading your system now will eliminate the ongoing cost to maintain customized software. As custom systems age, maintenance gets more complicated and often more expensive. But be prepared for a little extra effort, because your IT group may oppose a packaged solution that wasn’t developed internally.

oNo. Stop. Your old accounting system and nonintegrated manufacturing package are begging to be retired. The benefits of harnessing new technology can pay big dividends. The earlier you get started on an upgrade and conversion plan, the sooner you’ll see results.

The booklet also includes information on calculating consulting costs, determining if you can afford to buy or not to buy, electronic commerce, and hosted applications services.

RSS Feeds

Subscribe to All Content

Most Recent Blogs


Feature Articles

GE Turns to Makers to Bring 3D Printing to Aerospace

At 30,000 feet, equipment failure is simply not an option, which is part of why additive manufacturing has been a bit slow to catch on in the aerospace industry. But according to Michael Idelchik, vice president of GE’s advanced technologies research, GE Aviation is still looking for more ways that additive manufacturing can help to create a better airplane...
Read more...

Is Automation to Blame for Our Economic Woes?

Despite reassurances of automation professionals throughout the industry, some experts simply aren't convinced that technological advancements in robotics and automation aren't negatively impacting U.S. employment rates, which is what Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee of the MIT Sloan School of Management have been arguing over the past year and a half.
Read more...

Simulations Sail into the Shipyard

As far as modeling and simulation are concerned, nautical transportation isn’t one of the first things to come to mind. Still, it presents a unique use case for computer-integrated manufacturing, as the focus of the modeling and simulation is on the construction process itself. By coordinating the insertion of massive hull blocks, it not only streamlines construction, but it improves safety as well.
Read more...

Short Takes

Robots Take the Keys at Ford’s New Test Track

Jun 18, 2013 | When it comes to testing a new line of trucks, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that automakers such as Ford aren’t afraid to be tough on their latest models. But separating the pounding the trucks can take from the test driver can get a bit tricky, which is why Ford has recently handed the keys over to robots instead of flesh-and-blood drivers.
Read more...

3D Printer Section Appears on Amazon

Jun 14, 2013 | Last month’s news of 3D printers entering brick-and-mortar Staples stores may have represented a major step in mainstream commercialization of additive manufacturing tools, but in what is perhaps an even bigger step, online retail giant Amazon recently added a dedicated section of its site to 3D printers and supplies.
Read more...

Experts Chime in on the Future of Global Manufacturing

Jun 12, 2013 | In the wake of the economic downturn, reshoring efforts and increased emphasis on STEM, there’s plenty of uncertainty about where global manufacturing is headed in the next several years. Helping to give us a better sense of this trajectory is a group of thought leaders who have come together to try and answer the most pertinent questions about the future.
Read more...

Are Bachelor's Degrees All They're Cracked Up to Be?

Jun 11, 2013 | As the U.S. manufacturing sector fights to stay competitive on a global scale, the issue of improving STEM education has been key. But in a recent study measuring how workers in STEM fields are putting their educations to use it was found that half didn't need a bachelor's degree.
Read more...

Chevy Looks to Rapid Prototyping for the 2014 Malibu

Jun 10, 2013 | Chevrolet has added digital manufacturing technology to its arsenal. Abandoning clay for their latest Malibu, the automaker has turned to two types of additive manufacturing to meet their rapid prototyping needs.
Read more...

Sponsored Whitepapers

Big Data and Big Analytics for Product and Process Quality

03/20/2013 | SAS | This white paper examines how an enterprise-wide quality platform can turn existing data into substantial and sustainable revenue growth and cost savings for global manufacturers. The paper is based on the findings of the IW/SAS Enterprise Quality Survey completed by more than 400 manufacturing executives. The objectives of the survey were to determine concerns about quality among manufacturers; investigate the tools used to measure quality; and examine how using enterprise-wide analysis on quality data improves performance.

TATA Steel Automotive Engineering Depends on Univa

07/19/2011 | Univa | TATA Steel Automotive Engineering’s concern grew when open source Grid Engine support and development was discontinued by Oracle. Grid Engine is a business critical application in their environment. They recognized the likelihood that product enhancements and innovations would cease. Read how TATA Steel Automotive Engineering moved from a self-support solution to Univa Grid Engine. You can get more out of your environment and your budget with Univa Grid Engine.

Intel Conferences and Events

Featured Events






  • November 17, 2013 - November 22, 2013
    SC'13
    Denver, CO
    United States

Copyright © 2011-2013 Tabor Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Digital Manufacturing Report is a registered trademark of Tabor Communications, Inc. Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission of Tabor Communications Inc. is prohibited.
Powered by Xtenit.